We can do better than ‘C-‘ infrastructure says former OKC Mayor

We can do better than 'C-' infrastructure: Here's how to fund it
© Getty Images

 

Former Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett isn’t giving a high grade for the nation’s infrastructure.

In an op-ed this week in The Hill, Cornett and former Philadelphia mayor Michael Nutter scored it a “C Minus” and called for much more funding in the next decade.

Here’s their op-ed:

“Despite division on almost everything, there is bipartisan consensus that America’s infrastructure needs a major upgrade and needs it now. A report card issued this spring from the American Society of Civil Engineers scored our nation’s infrastructure a “C minus” and called for an additional $2.6 trillion in funding over the next decade to fix the deficiencies.

The talk of the town in Washington, DC is infrastructure. A bipartisan infrastructure bill being negotiated by Congress is one of the most-watched pieces of legislation in years. Unfortunately, politics is getting in the way, again. How to fund the bill’s nearly $1.2 trillion price tag has gotten bogged down in the usual gridlock.

Newsmakers with Mayor Michael Nutter and Mayor Mick Cornett | C-SPAN.org

As mayors, we ran our cities with two goals in mind: make our communities more livable and make it easier to get around. But like state and federal governments, mayors work with limited budgets and must think outside the box when it comes to funding infrastructure improvements in their cities. Last week, 369 Mayors signed a letter to Congress urging immediate action on the issue.

San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge is perhaps the most recognizable P3, constructed during the throes of the Great Depression when the federal funds and tax base were simply insufficient for a project of this magnitude.

Right now, Congress and the White House agree that P3s offer a funding source to cover some of the infrastructure price tag. In a fact sheet issued by the Biden administration, P3s, including private activity bonds, direct pay bonds and asset recycling for infrastructure investment, are included under the proposed financing sources. What a great start.

P3s work by creating long-term leases for qualified operators to manage and maintain infrastructure assets. The deals are designed to incentivize the private operators to pick up the tab for the repair and maintenance of existing infrastructure, as well as build new projects, leveraging expertise government officials simply do not have.

The government and taxpayers are never responsible for the debt incurred by the partnership in developing a project like a highway. The state and taxpayers are fully protected, and the roadway always remains state-owned.

Local governments have recently started entering “lease, don’t sell models” allowing them to rehab current assets using P3s, generating revenue for their municipalities and citizens while not being responsible for the costs and upkeep. It’s a true win-win.

It is not just roads and bridges that are in desperate need of repair and new construction. Public schools and buildings, housing, seaports, airports and increasing access to high-speed broadband are all a major part of our nation’s infrastructure needs. Funding these critical projects are no small task and should not have to rely solely on tax increases and new borrowing. Time is of the essence and the private sector is ready to step up and help. Congress should do their part to support the integrity of America’s infrastructure now.

We were pleased to see P3s included in the list of funding sources agreed upon by the White House and a bipartisan coalition of senators last month. If anything can stay above the partisan rancor, it should be a commonsense funding source like P3s. We are hopeful they will.

Click here for “The Hill”