Public Service Company of Oklahoma gained support recently for its $1.2 billion request for approval of eight energy projects whose cost would be borne totally by consumers and customers.
The proposed investments include a Battery Energy Storage System project and additional natural gas generation resources that PSO contends are necessary to maintain long-term reliability and meet growing electricity demand across its service territory. The request is currently under review before the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
Fire chiefs voice public safety support
In a letter dated Feb. 9 from Mat Schockley, Fire Chief of the Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District headquartered in Oologah, stated he supported not only PSO’s proposed Battery Energy Storage System project, but also PSO’s “additional gas generation units.
“Our fire district is strategically positioned to provide rapid and effective emergency response to this facility should the need ever arise,” wrote the chief, adding, “From a public safety standpoint, we believe this project can be supported with confidence that emergency services are in place and prepared.”
He also wrote that “projects such as this represent important infrastructure investments that support reliable energy for our communities while also contributing to local economic development.”
Hennessey Fire Chief Brandon Scott also sent a supportive letter, stating he believes the projects will contribute meaningfully to public safety by providing information and research of the project, providing necessary training both in-class and on-site for responders and providing additional water resources for fire protection in the district.
“As a public safety agency committed to protecting the lives and property of the residents of the Hennessey Fire District, we recognize the importance of initiatives that strengthen infrastructure, enhance reliability, and promote long-term community resilience.”
“We respectfully encourage your approval of PSO Battery Storage Facility project 2025-000064, as it represents a positive step toward a safer and more resilient future?”
Economic development leaders weigh in
Support came from others too, including from Yolanda Creswell, Economic Development Director for the city of Weatherford.
“I am writing to express my strong support for Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) and the positive impact the company has on Weatherford and the surrounding region,” she wrote to corporation commissioners. “PSO has been a valuable partner in advancing economic development initiatives and strengthening our community.”
Grant County Assessor Robin Herod in Medford also supports the $1.2 billion in projects.
“I am thrilled that the work they are doing will add so much tax revenue to our county over the next 20 years.”
Stigler City Manager Bobby Mouser added his support, writing, “I understand to have reliable, safe electricity investments must be made. PSO has an excellent record for reliability and service.”
McAlester Interim City Manager Kenneth J. Wimmer, Jr. wrote much the same, explaining “The positive impact PSO brings to McAlester and our area, particularly in the area of economic development, is significant.”
Unusual support from Oklahoma Gas and Electric
In an unusual twist last month, PSO even was supported by Oklahoma Gas and Electric (OG&E). It joined PSO in fighting a move by Attorney General Gentner Drummond who argued that OGE’s battery storage projects do not meet the definition of “new electric generating facility” under rules of the Corporation Commission.
“OG&E disagrees. As a similarly situated regulated electric utility, OG&E has a direct interest in the outcome of this novel legal argument and similar to the Company’s limited intervention in October, again requests to be heard.”
The debate over battery storage and generation expansion reflects broader discussions underway at the Corporation Commission about how utilities recover costs for major infrastructure projects and how those investments affect electric rates for residential and commercial customers.