Bold Nebraska Attacks Keystone XL Draft Environmental Assessment

The U.S. Department of State recently published its Draft Environmental Assessment for the Keystone XL Pipeline Mainline Alternative Route in Nebraska and at least one coalition has expressed vehement opposition to the proposal.

Bold Nebraska, a progressive grassroots political advocacy group, has numerous points of contention.

The coalition asserts the plan minimizes the impact of the Keystone XL pipeline by stating it “would produce only minor impacts to the land, water, endangered species and Native American sacred sites in Nebraska like the Ponca Trail of Tears.”

The group alleges a due process violation occurred for the directly affected landowners on the Mainline Alternative route, many of whom were not aware until late 2017 that the pipeline might be plowing through their farms or coming as close as 100 feet from their homes and private wells. Bold Nebraska says there will be no additional public hearings to address this critical issue.

“We’re outraged at this violation of due process — and Bold, along with Tribal Nations and other environmental groups, continue to challenge the Trump Administration’s rubber-stamp approval of a federal permit for KXL in court,” stated Mark Hefflinger, in a press release issued on Tuesday by Bold Nebraska.

The group says the Environmental Assessment states that while “cultural resources” reviews remain ongoing, the Mainline Alternative route, which would cross the historic Ponca Trail of Tears, and come within 25 miles of the grave of Standing Bear, would have only “minor” impacts on these sacred sites.

Bold Nebraska calls out the government and Environmental Assessment by alleging it utilized shortcuts rather than a more thorough review of significant issues including:

  • Oil spills: The review includes analysis of the effects of a potential tarsands oil spill from Keystone XL and its disastrous effects on pristine farmland, native prairie grasses, aquifers and other water bodies like the Missouri River, where a spill could travel more than 40 miles downstream and contaminate drinking water for Lincoln and Omaha. It concludes only “minor” potential impacts from a tarsands spill into our precious Ogallala aquifer, or into the fragile Sandhills and sandy soils that make up the “prime farmland” that comprises 72% of the route.
  • Endangered species: The review ignores science at every turn to find only “minor” or “negligible” impacts on Endangered Species whose habitat is in the pipeline’s path, including the beloved and iconic Whooping Crane.
  • Construction issues: The review notes that TransCanada plans to use the same controversial and dangerous construction technique of “weighting” the pipeline down near water bodies and in floodplain areas, which was shown to cause protective coating to erode leading to a 407,000-gallon spill on the company’s original Keystone Pipeline in South Dakota in 2017.

A new 30-day public review and comment period is open through August 29, 2018.

The 304-page Draft Environmental Assessment can be viewed here.


%d bloggers like this: